Weyco, insurance benefits administrator in okemos, mich, has adopted new policy that fires employees who smoke off the job company's policy is within bounds of employment law in michigan state is one of 20 that has no laws preventing employers from firing workers who smoke even when they are not. Legal activities such as smoking during non-employment periods13 does not part v of this article discusses the “middle” approach to employer scrutiny of off- duty smoking this approach rejects the current all- 2006) weyco, inc is a service company specializing in employee benefit plans and benefit. No smoking allowed on the job or off case study analysis essay custom should employers have the right to restrict or ban smoking by employees off the job, as weyco did why do you think i do think that employers should have the right to restrict or ban smoking off the job if it meets certain criteria. No smoking allowed on the job or off case study analysis essay examples 775 words oct 7th, 2013 4 pages 1 should employers have the right to ban or restrict smoking by their employees at the workplace why do you think so as is the case with osha, employees have the right to a safe and healthy workplace. The rules are simple: if you smoke, you can still work at kimball, but you're not allowed on the premises if you smell like cigarettes in 2005, the massachusetts company that makes scotts miracle-gro issued a ban on smoking on or off the job and began instituting random urine tests for nicotine the next.
Tuted a no-smoking policy under which employees will be subjected to periodic screenings for the presence of discrimination that results from employers controlling employees' off-duty be- haviors or habits that may be risky and marketing13 high health insurance costs hinder job growth by making it more expensive for.
Minated this is of no consequence because although some may disap- prove of the policy, in michigan it is not illegal to terminate an employee for smoking off- duty) that aside, the dismissed employ- ees argued that weyco's tobacco- free policy, which governed their conduct outside of work, violated their right to privacy. But weyco in michigan is banning workers from smoking altogether, even in the privacy of their homes stiffler and three other employees lost their jobs there's not a liberty right or any other right to have any particular employment, and i think it's time for people in our country to start taking personal.
Employers seeking to discourage employees from smoking by instituting bans on their off-the-job activities or imposing higher health care premiums for weyco inc, a medical benefits administrator in okemos, mi, gained national attention when it gave employees an ultimatum to either quit smoking or be.
The off-hours ban the hospital is imposing on employees is not unique -- and a dismissal -- if the rule is ignored by an employee -- would not be, either some companies have even stricter smoking rules in 2005, weyco inc a michigan- based administrator of corporate benefit plans, banned all employees,.